Well, as some of my readers already know, I do consider myself to be a scholar. I've always been a well-read person since I was a child. In college, as a History/English/Humanities major, I was on reading and writing overload, especially with the Honors Programme. So, when I realized that I was actually a polytheist, I tried to find things to read. There wasn't anything in the 1960s and 1970s in regular book stores. It is still difficult unless you are close to a college or university book store. Back then there was no Amazon. What little there was could be cataloged under the heading of DRECK. It took a while to find those first books, which were almost all published by university presses.
Anyway, I am having to replace some titles (too tattered etc.) and I am getting into the early philosophers (the Atomists and pre-Socratics). There is also a lot of newer scholarship out there, so I need to keep up if I decide to become a priestess and neokoroi.
Connelly, Joan Breton. Portrait of a Priestess: Women and Ritual in Ancient Greece
Patton, Kimberley Christina. Religion of the Gods: Ritual, Paradox, and Reflexivity
MacIntyre, Alasdair. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues (The Paul Lectures)
Deacy, Susan. Athena.
Waterfield, Robin. The First Philosophers: The Pre-Socratics and Sophists
Epicurus. The Art of Happiness.
Porphyry. Porphyry's Against the Christians.
Celsus. On the True Doctrine: A Discourse Against the Christians
Mikalson, Jon D. Ancient Greek Religion
Pagden, Anthony. The Enlightenment: And Why It Still Matters
Mills, Stephanie. Epicurean Simplicity.
Guthrie, William. Greeks and Their Gods (Ariadne Series)
Johnston, Sarah Iles. Ancient Greek Divination.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
The Consolations of Philosophy: A New Series of Posts
Now, I am a realist and not a pie-in-the-sky romantic. This is a result of my own personal experience as well as personality. The Classical world generally was a world of realism. The great philosophical schools of Epicureanism, Stoicism, Platonism and Aristotelianism each tried to deal with the great question of human happiness: what was it? of what did it consist?
However, even human happiness was/is a fleeting thing, at best. Yes, boys and girls, you have to put on your adult underwear and learn to carry on with gaping wounds as well as the smaller scratches which will never heal. And they WILL not. Most all POP Psychology self-help is a crock as is vicarious atonement. Philosophy is not navel-gazing.
However, even human happiness was/is a fleeting thing, at best. Yes, boys and girls, you have to put on your adult underwear and learn to carry on with gaping wounds as well as the smaller scratches which will never heal. And they WILL not. Most all POP Psychology self-help is a crock as is vicarious atonement. Philosophy is not navel-gazing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)